RINGKASAN: Penelitian ini hendak mengkaji keefektifan model pendekatan taktik dan teknik, yang mungkin diharapkan dapat dijadikan sebagai model alternatif dalam rangka pengembangan kualitas pembelajaran permainan bolavoli. Metode eksperimen dengan desain pasca-tes subyek acak dalam dua kelompok digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Pengumpulan data dilakukan terhadap subyek sebanyak 60 siswa SMPN (Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri) 4 Kota Bandung, yang diambil dengan teknik random sampling sederhana dan dibagi dalam dua kelompok. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara statistik dengan menggunakan teknik MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa: (1) Model pendekatan taktik dan model pendekatan teknik memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda secara signifikan terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan teknik dasar bolavoli, keterampilan bermain bolavoli, dan keterampilan berpikir kritis; (2) Model pendekatan taktik memiliki pengaruh yang lebih efektif terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan teknik dasar bolavoli dibandingkan dengan model pendekatan teknik; (3) Model pendekatan taktik memberikan pengaruh yang lebih efektif terhadap prestasi belajar bolavoli dibandingkan dengan model pendekatan teknik; dan (4) Model pendekatan taktik memiliki pengaruh yang lebih efektif terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dibandingkan dengan model pendekatan teknik.

KATA KUNCI: Model pendekatan taktik dan teknik, implementasi pembelajaran, permainan bolavoli, siswa sekolah menengah pertama, serta kualitas pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

ABSTRACT: “The Model Implementation of Technical and Tactical Approaches in Volleyball Instruction of Physical Education on Junior High School Students”. The present study is confined to examining whether technical and tactical approaches that may be implemented as the alternative models to develop a volleyball instruction quality. The experimental method with randomized post-test of two groups design was employed in this study. The data collected from subjects consisting of sixty of Junior High School 4 Bandung’s students who were randomly selected and categorized into two groups. All data obtain was statistically analysed by adopting MANOVA (Multivariate Analysis of Variance) at a = 0.05 significance level. Based on the result of study, it can be identified that: (1) Tactical and technical approaches model have significant differences in influencing volleyball basic technique skills, volleyball game skills, and critical thinking skills in learning achievement; (2) Tactical approach model has higher effect on volleyball basic technique skills in learning achievement compared to technical approach model; (3) Tactical approach model has higher effect on volleyball game skills in learning achievement compared to technical approach model; and (4) Tactical approach model has higher effect on critical thinking skills compared to technical approach model.

KEY WORD: Technical and tactical approaches, teaching implementation, volleyball playing, junior high school students, and quality of teaching and learning.

About the Author: Dr. Yunyun Yudiana adalah Dosen Senior di Fakultas Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan UPI (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia), Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi No.229 Bandung 40154, Jawa Barat, Indonesia. Untuk kepentingan akademik, penulis bisa dihubungi dengan alamat emel: dekan_fpok@upi.edu

How to cite this article? Yudiana, Yunyun. (2015). “Implementasi Model Pendekatan Taktik dan Teknik dalam Pembelajaran Permainan Bola Voli pada Pendidikan Jasmani Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama” in ATIKAN: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, Vol.5(1) June, pp.95-114. Bandung, Indonesia: Minda Masagi Press and FPOK UPI Bandung, ISSN 2088-1290.

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (April 29, 2015); Revised (May 29, 2015); and Published (June 30, 2015).

model pendekatan taktik dan teknik; implementasi pembelajaran; permainan bolavoli; siswa sekolah menengah pertama; kualitas pengajaran dan pembelajaran

Ahmad, Arief. (2007). “Memahami Berpikir Kritis”. Tersedia secara online di: www.pendidikan.network.com [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 17 Januari 2015].

Alison, S. & R. Thorpe. (1997). “A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Teaching Games within Physical Education: A Skills Approach Versus a Games for Understanding Approach” dalam The British Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), hlm.9-13.

Bompa, Tudor O. (1994). Theory and Methodology of Training. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, third edition.

Broek, G.V., T. Ceux & T. Madou. (2008). “The Effects of a Studeny-Centered Versus Teacher-Centered Teaching Approach on Tactical Learning Outcomes: A Volleyball Case”. Paper presented in the Symposium-Leuven on 21 March 2008, at Leuven, Katholleke Universiteit, Department of Human Kinesiology.

“Critical Thinking Test”. Tersedia secara online di: www.criticalthinking.org [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 17 Januari 2015].

Depdiknas RI [Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia]. (2003). Standar Kompetensi: Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Donald, A., L.C. Jacob & A. Razavieh. (1982). Pengantar Penelitian dalam Pendidikan. Surabaya: Penerbit Usaha Nasional, Terjemahan Arief Furchan.

Dryden, Gordon & Jeannette Vos. (2000). Revolusi Cara Belajar: Keajaiban Pikiran. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa, Terjemahan.

Ennis, Robert H. (1996). Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Fisher, Alec. (2009). Berpikir Kritis: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, Terjemahan Benyamin Hadinata.

Forrest G., P. Webb & P. Pearson. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU): A Model for Pre Service Teachers. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.

Freed & Huba. (2000). Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms. New York: Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses.

Gallahue, David L. (1989). Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents. Indianapolis: Benchmark Press, Inc., second edition.

Ghozali, Imam. (2009). Aplikasi Multivariat Analisis dengan Program SPSS. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Glavin, Suzanne. (2008). Strategic Lead Youth Sport England. London: n.p. [no publisher].

Griffin, L.L., S.A. Mitchel & J.L. Oslin. (1997). Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach. USA [United States of America]: Human Kinetics.

Hopper, Timothy. (1998). Teaching Games for Understanding: Using Progressive Principles of Play. University of Victoria: CAHPERD Journal de I’ACSEPLD.

Hopper, Tim & Darren Kruisselbrink. (2002). “Teaching Games for Understanding: What Does it Look Like and How Does it Influence Student Skill Learning and Game Performance?”. Tersedia secara online di: http://web.uvic.ca/-thopper/WEB/articles/Advante/TGFUmotorlearn.pdf [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 2 Maret 2015].

Hurlock, Elizabeth B. (1994). Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, Terjemahan Istiwidayanti & Soedjarwo, edisi kelima.

Kirk, David. (2006). The Idea of Physical Education and its Discontents: An Inaugural Lecture. UK [United Kingdom]: Leeds Metropolitan University.

Light, R. & R. Fawns. (2003). “Knowing the Game: Integrating Speech and Action in Games Teaching through TGFU” dalam QUEST: National Association for Kinesiology and Physical Education in Higher Education, 55, hlm.161-176.

Mandigo, James L. & Nicholas L. Holt. (2004). Reading the Game: Introducing the Notion of Games Literacy. USA [United States of America]: Physical Education and Kinesiology at Brock University.

Martens, Rainer. (2004). Succesful Coaching. Hongkong: Human Kinetics Publisher, Inc.

McMillan, Kieran. (2007). “Using Games to Teach Skill”. Paper presented in the Asia Pacific Conference on Teaching Sport and Physical Education for Understanding at the University of Sidney, Australia.

Metzler, Michael W. (2000). Instructional Models for Physical Education. USA [United States of America]: Allyn & Bacon, first edition.

Patrick, John J. (2000). “Critical Thinking in Social Studies” dalam Eric Digest, No.30.

PBVSI [Persatuan Bola Voli Seluruh Indonesia]. (1995). Panduan Pembinaan Bolavoli di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Umum PP PBVSI [Pengurus Pusat Persatuan Bola Voli Seluruh Indonesia].

Polini, Nick. (2002). “Adolescents and Sports: How it Develops Health, Sportsmanship, and Self Esteem”. Tersedia secara online di: http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/ndarling/styles/adol.css [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 17 Januari 2015].

Rycroft, Paul. (2008). “A Tactical Approach to Teaching Game”. Paper presented in the ACHPER HPE Annual State Conference in Australia.

Sawula, Lorne. (1982). Volleyball Development Model. Canada: Canadian Volleyball Association.

Setiono, Agustinus. (2007). “Berpikir Kritis”. Tersedia secara online di: www.blog.wordpress.com [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 17 Januari 2015].

Strand, Bradford N. & Rolayne Wilson. (1993). Assessing Sport Skills. USA [United States of America]: Human Kinetics Publishers.

Sugiyanto & Sudjarwo. (1991). Perkembangan dan Belajar Gerak. Jakarta: Depdikbud RI [Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia].

Thorpe, R., D. Bunker & L. Almond. (1986). Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough: Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Technology.

Turner, A.P., P.C. Allison & B.W. Pissanos. (2001). “Constructing a Concept of Skillfulness in Invasion Games within a Games for Understanding Context” dalam European Journal of Physical Education, 6(1), hlm.38-54.

Turner, A.P. & T.J. Martinek. (1999). “An Investigation into Teaching Game for Understanding: Effects on Skill, Knowledge, and Game Play” dalam Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), hlm.286-296.

Wallhead, T.L. & D. Deglau. (2004). “Effect of a Tactical Approach on Student Motivation in Physical Education”. Tersedia secara online di: http://aahperd.confex.com/aahperd/2004 [diakses di Bandung, Indonesia: 20 Mei 2015].